OK, as I said, I’ve been very busy of late with several projects that are due, um, well, today. By Midnight. Still busy, but I was starting to feel guilty because, for some bizarre reason, I actually have some people reading this tripe.

So, Redskins were shutout. I believe it was only the third time in franchise history. It was god-awful. I couldn’t watch the fourth quarter. They played as bad or worse than they did at anytime last year. It just doesn’t make any sense for a team that has proven themselves the way they have in the first half of the season.

My guess: this game came down to espionage. The former Redskins on the Giants team knew more about the play calling than the former Giants on the Redskins team. They certainly seemed to know exactly what was happening on every single f***ing play. I’m not bitter though…

In other news: Libby indicted. Yay! To those right-wingers who point and say how awful someone like me is to take glee in this: too bad. You took glee in the entire Clinton affair. Even if you didn’t voice it (and most of you did). My mother taught me a word: comeuppance (come uppance). That’s what this is. It suits my sense of social justice immensely.

In still more news: Bush is now officially the lamest duck president in modern history. Suspend the Davis-Bacon Act? Nope, don’t think so. Nominate another crony post-Katrina? Nice try, now try again (which he did this morning). Appearing with Republican Governors? Maybe next year. But if you don’t mind staying out-of-sight in the meantime, that would be greeaaat.

Ok, back to work.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

OK, looks like the entire Republican party will soon be behind bars. My prediction about the Redskins last week was close, but no cigar. Better luck this week. Very, very busy with my business for the next few weeks. Probably won’t be posting. Sorry.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

I came into the season with no expectations. Or rather, with the same expectations as last year: awesome defense, pathetic offense with no quarterback. Suddenly Mark Brunell seems to have found himself and has taken over as the starting quarterback. I’m not sad to see Patrick Ramsey on the sidelines. I think he is always going to panic and choke. He was a bad draft pick. They should trade him for a good towel boy. Ok, maybe that’s a little harsh, but, still. I don’t even want him as a backup QB.

Turns out trading Champ Bailey for Clinton Portis was about the smartest thing the Redskins could have done. Who saw that one coming? Well, other than Joe Gibbs that is. That man deserves a hell of a lot of credit. The Redskins went 6-10 last season and he had to take the heat for that. As if you can come in to a team and turn it around instantaneously. I don’t know what the season will end up being, but I know what it is right now: 3-0.

I’ve taken great joy week after week watching the experts pick whoever the Redskins are playing against to win, especially King Kaufmann over at Salon.com, but that’s probably just because I read Salon a lot. Once again, everybody has picked their opponent going into week five: the Denver Broncos. Most Redskins fans that are publishing their predictions have them at 1-5 over the next six games. Maybe I’m an eternal optimist but I think they can do much better than that. I had originally gone 2-4, but after reflecting on it a bit, I can see 3-3 or better. After all, they’ve proven everybody wrong three times already, haven’t they?

I’m not just being a blind optimist here. They’ve held their opponents to an average of 12 points a game with only two turnovers so far this season. People don’t seem to have noticed the changes in the defense that have been consistent so far. Every week people talk about how much they expect the Redskins to blitz, but they haven’t been blitzing all that much. Look for Gibbs and Williams to mix things up. Gibbs likes to do that. If they’ve been winning by an average of a measley two points per game, something everybody keeps talking about, imagine what they can do if they force two or three turnovers in a single game?

I think they’ve been playing a more conservative defense against the weaker teams in their schedule just to be able to throw off the stronger teams when they change things up. Based on that assumption, I don’t expect much blitzing from them in the first half of this Sunday’s game. I expect they’ll see how things play out and then decide if they need to change things up during the halftime. From a strategy standpoint it makes a lot of sense.

On a different note, it’s always been about a good defense getting teams into the playoffs which in turn get teams into the Superbowl (no, I have no illusions about the Redskins going to the Superbowl this year, this is “on a different note”). One season differs from the norm on this (last season) and suddenly it’s all about the offense? Since when do we throw out years and years of statistical data in favor of the anomaly? Here we are a quarter of the way into the season and has anybody noticed anything? Like maybe that the strong defensive teams are dominating right now? It’s only a quarter of the way into the season, but I’ll take that statistic over last years fluke. Meanwhile, I suspect the experts will go on waiting for the NFL to correct itself and reassert the dominance of the strong offensive teams.

In case you haven’t guessed, I’m predicting a win for the Redskins this Sunday. So far, their offense has proven itself to be the better of the two (statistically) and I’m confident they have the better defense too. Brunell was the biggest unknown for me and watching him connect over and over again when throwing backwards while running for the sidelines has convinced me that he’s the real deal. He may have only connected 20 of 36 passes last week, but those were the 20 that mattered. Twelve of the twenty were 3rd down conversions! A quarterback that gets better the more pressure there is? Talk about the exact opposite of Patrick Ramsey.

Here’s hoping I’m right about Sunday.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

There are a lot of topics in the web development world that come around every so often like clockwork. Usually it’s a “how do I do this?” question from another newbie for the umpteenth time on a list you’ve been a member of for five or six years. Sometimes, it’s a higher-level discussion about “where is the web going?” I suspect the newest discussion that will ebb and flow will be about the “Web 2.0.”

Then there are the meta-discussions that contain dozens of smaller discussions that also go around and around. The separation of style and content would be a meta-discussion. Originally it was just a regular discussion, but then it actually start happening and it spawned (or maybe it was spawned by) discussions about the semantic web. One of the conversations that further fractured from that regarded a standardized nomenclature for styles.

That is something I’ve thought about for a while for my own personal use. As a designer, I could create my own templating system akin to what they do over at CSS Zen Garden. I’ve even thought about using the Zen Garden HTML template and seeing how well I could adapt it to my customers’ websites. Taking it a step further, I thought about using the Zen Garden HTML template to develop WordPress themes and seeing how well I could adapt those to my customers’ websites. Sounds crazy doesn’t it? It might be.

It’s entirely possible that, in many instances, such applications wouldn’t be the best solution for a client. In those instances, the solution would have to be abandoned in favor of a better one. But, in other instances, it might work out great. For that group, a common set of solutions would exist which would improve my workflow and turnaround time. As an independant web developer that would improve my bottom line.

More altruistically though, it would also allow me to apply that common set of solutions to give back to the community by creating templates. I know that doesn’t sound like much, but hear me out. Each template could be put up on CSS Zen Garden as an example of what is possible and at the same time could be used as an actual WordPress Theme. People use blogging tools like WordPress because it lowers the barrier to entry: they can self-publish on the web without having to learn how to write XHTML, CSS, and PHP code. They don’t have to create their own .htaccess files to make their URLs more human (and machine) readable. In as little as five minutes they can be up-and-running with a robust content publishing/management system and all they have to do is put their content out there for the world to read.

You might think this is a bad idea since, let’s face it, most content will be utter schlock, but that’s ok. You don’t have to read it. Blogs are the harbinger of the Web 2.0. The web as a two-way medium. I post something that, like this very post, is only read by a handful of people, half of whom probably know me in “real life.” But they can comment on my post and I can comment on their comments. It’s the web as a two-way communications medium, not just me pushing content out there and you can like it or shut up–or both.

Putting out templates that could be used by people to help them communicate their message to a wider audience, when they might not otherwise have been able to communicate their message at all, is a great thing. Besides, as a designer, it’s the best contribution I can make to the blogging community. As a WordPress user, I feel a certain obligation to give back for what I’ve gotten.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Just something funny: can’t seem to get to the confirmthem.com website. I’ve been trying for a few minutes now. It’s funny because the site was devoted to getting Bush’s nominees confirmed unquestioningly. The mere suggestion that Democrats might have valid concerns or questions was ridiculed.

Then came the revelation that everything they had been spouting was nothing more than partisan hackery, and her name was Harriet Miers. All of a sudden a site called “Confirm Them” was all about not confirming them. A lot of people felt it was worth pointing out the irony in that. A lot of people on the left that is. Now, all of a sudden, the site isn’t available.

If only more right-wing pundit websites could drop off the face of the earth so easily. If only this disappearance is permanent.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Just a short little wish here: wouldn’t it be great if the Gang of 14, the group of moderate senators that forged the compromise on judicial nominations, split from their respective parties to form a centrist party? I’d support that. He’ll, it’d be the first time I supported a party financially.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

No word yet on whether you can also indict a ham sandwhich twice. Teehee.

It was a separate Grand Jury and a separate charge. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, the Republican COC has to be stopped. Insomuch as this draws attention to the problem and helps correct it, the indictments are a Very Good Thing.

Man, it’s 93 degrees outside right now but it’s never felt more like Christmas.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

I cross-posted my last entry to Daily Kos. One of the responses I received was to the effect of “this is not a game; the Senate needs to advise and consent, demand documents, etc., then make a decision; and that celebrating is premature.” (paraphrased) That’s fair, I respect the opinion, and I felt I hadn’t explained myself fully enough. So, some clarification:

The Republican party realized a long time ago that politics is a game and they set about learning how to win it. That said, I in no way mean to imply that this is frivolous or not of consequence.

When planning a strategy you have to account for even the things you don’t want to hear. Otherwise, you might as well go sign up for the Bush war planning department. Here is reality: she will get confirmed. Do you honestly think there is a snowball’s chance in $@#% of any other outcome?

Another thing about strategy planning: it’s a good idea to have an endgame planned before you go in. So you can’t count on any blinding revelations to come out of the confirmation hearings. If by some miracle that does happen, there will be time enough left to filibuster or give a straight down vote with moderate Republican support.

So if we assume a) that nothing revealing will come out and b) that she will be confirmed, the question becomes: what advantage can we gain from this? What is our endgame?

Have you read any right-wing blogs today? We have a very clear opportunity here. I think this concept of blindly doing the same thing over and over again is BAD. We need to analyze the situation and gain whatever we can here. In military terms, a wedge is a great way to break the ranks of the enemy. I can see no better gain here.

Read the original post if you haven’t already.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Harriet Miers is an unwilling gift to the Democratic party.

The Republican party, by strength of their own scandals, no longer has the political will for the nuclear option. That means Democrats could have filibustered an extremist nominee with impunity. Knowing that, Bush was stuck.

Here’s how I (hopefully) see this playing out: Democrats will call for documents (of course) and talk about having questions answered. Other than that though, they’ll sit back and let the far-right do all of the bashing. They won’t really sit back though. They’ll endorse her because it will prove to the far-right that they’re being duped. Going into the 2006 primaries, it’s a great wedge between the moderates and the zealots.

The usual obstination just isn’t worth it. It would leave the Democrats looking obstructionist but, on top of that, I think there is a good chance she’s another Souter or Kennedy. And, whether we want to admit it or not, the winner of the election does have some say, to put it mildly.

UPDATE: I just listened to Sen. Mark Pryor (D - Arkansas) talking on Hardball. He is taking a neutral stance and sounding every bit the statesman on this issue. That’s fine. He came off great. So far I haven’t seen any Democratic senator have a kneejerk response against Miers. Meanwhile the right-wing blogs haven’t let up. They’re still apoplectic over this nominee.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

I didn’t post this yesterday, but as a lifelong Redskins fan, it cannot go without comment: they are 3-o for the first time since 1991. That was also the last time they won the superbowl. I’m under no illusions here, this is only our second season with coach Gibbs back and our quarterback is 35 years old. But! Our owner finally seems to have gotten his ass out of the decision making process, we have stability and growth, and Gibbs. And did I mention that we are 3-0? Woohoo!

PS I ripped off the headline from Bozzy’s Word.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.